Author:
Alkhamis Moh A.,Al Jarallah Mohammad,Attur Sreeja,Zubaid Mohammad
Abstract
AbstractThe relationships between acute coronary syndromes (ACS) adverse events and the associated risk factors are typically complicated and nonlinear, which poses significant challenges to clinicians' attempts at risk stratification. Here, we aim to explore the implementation of modern risk stratification tools to untangle how these complex factors shape the risk of adverse events in patients with ACS. We used an interpretable multi-algorithm machine learning (ML) approach and clinical features to fit predictive models to 1,976 patients with ACS in Kuwait. We demonstrated that random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithms, remarkably outperform traditional logistic regression model (AUCs = 0.84 & 0.79 for RF and XGB, respectively). Our in-hospital adverse events model identified left ventricular ejection fraction as the most important predictor with the highest interaction strength with other factors. However, using the 30-days adverse events model, we found that performing an urgent coronary artery bypass graft was the most important predictor, with creatinine levels having the strongest overall interaction with other related factors. Our ML models not only untangled the non-linear relationships that shape the clinical epidemiology of ACS adverse events but also elucidated their risk in individual patients based on their unique features.
Funder
Ministry of Health, Kuwait
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Sanchis-Gomar, F., Perez-Quilis, C., Leischik, R. & Lucia, A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann. Transl. Med. 4, 256. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.06.33 (2016).
2. Lindstrom, M. et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks collaboration, 1990–2021. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 80, 2372–2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.001 (2022).
3. Tsao, C. W. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 145, e153–e639. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 (2022).
4. Feberation, W. H. World health report 2023: Confronting the world’s number one killer, https://world-heart-federation.org/wp-content/uploads/World-Heart-Report-2023.pdf (2023).
5. Joseph, J., Velasco, A., Hage, F. G. & Reyes, E. Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 25, 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1055-0 (2018).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献