Author:
Parr-Cortes Z.,Müller C. T.,Talas L.,Mendl M.,Guest C.,Rooney N. J.
Abstract
AbstractDogs can discriminate stressed from non-stressed human odour samples, but the effect on their cognition is unstudied. Using a cognitive bias task, we tested how human odours affect dogs’ likelihood of approaching a food bowl placed at three ambiguous locations (“near-positive”, “middle” and “near-negative”) between trained “positive” (rewarded) and “negative” (unrewarded) locations. Using odour samples collected from three unfamiliar volunteers during stressful and relaxing activities, we tested eighteen dogs under three conditions: no odour, stress odour and relaxed odour, with the order of test odours counterbalanced across dogs. When exposed to stress odour during session three, dogs were significantly less likely to approach a bowl placed at one of the three ambiguous locations (near-negative) compared to no odour, indicating possible risk-reduction behaviours in response to the smell of human stress. Dogs’ learning of trained positive and negative locations improved with repeated testing and was significant between sessions two and three only when exposed to stress odour during session three, suggesting odour influenced learning. This is the first study to show that without visual or auditory cues, olfactory cues of human stress may affect dogs’ cognition and learning, which, if true, could have important consequences for dog welfare and working performance.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference103 articles.
1. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Rapson, R. L. Primitive emotional contagion. In Emotion and Social Behavior Vol. 14 (ed. Clark, M. S.) 151–177 (Sage Publications Inc, 1992).
2. de Groot, J. H., Semin, G. R. & Smeets, M. A. I can see, hear, and smell your fear: Comparing olfactory and audiovisual media in fear communication. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033731 (2014).
3. Albrecht, J. et al. Smelling chemosensory signals of males in anxious versus nonanxious condition increases state anxiety of female subjects. Chem. Senses 36, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjq087 (2011).
4. Prehn, A., Ohrt, A., Sojka, B., Ferstl, R. & Pause, B. M. Chemosensory anxiety signals augment the startle reflex in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 394, 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.012 (2006).
5. Mutic, S., Parma, V., Brunner, Y. F. & Freiherr, J. You smell dangerous: Communicating fight responses through human chemosignals of aggression. Chem. Senses 41, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv058 (2016).