Abstract
Abstract
Quality evaluation of a material’s surface is performed through roughness analysis of surface samples. Several techniques have been presented to achieve this goal, including geometrical analysis and surface roughness analysis. Geometric analysis allows a visual and subjective evaluation of roughness (a qualitative assessment), whereas computation of the roughness parameters is a quantitative assessment and allows a standardized analysis of the surfaces. In civil engineering, the process is performed with mechanical profilometer equipment (2D) without adequate accuracy and laser profilometer (3D) with no consensus on how to interpret the result quantitatively. This work proposes a new method to evaluate surface roughness, starting from the generation of a visual surface roughness signature, which is calculated through the roughness parameters computed in hierarchically organized regions. The evaluation tools presented in this new method provide a local and more accurate evaluation of the computed coefficients. In the tests performed it was possible to quantitatively analyze roughness differences between ceramic blocks and to find that a quantitative microscale analysis allows to identify the largest variation of roughness parameters Raavg, Rasdv, Ramin and Ramax between samples, which benefit the evaluation and comparison of the sampled surfaces.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Thamboo, J. A. & Dhanasekar, M. Characterisation of thin layer polymer cement mortared concrete masonry bond. Constr. Build. Mater. 82, 71–80,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.098
(2015).
2. Venkatarama Reddy, B., Lal, R. & Nanjunda Rao, K. Enhancing bond strength and characteristics of soil-cement block masonry. J. materials civil engineering 19, 164–172 (2007).
3. Taha, M. R. & Shrive, N. The use of pozzolans to improve bond and bond strength. In 9 th Canadian masonry symposium. Canadá (2001).
4. Myshkin, N., Petrokovets, M. & Chizhik, S. Simulation of real contact in tribology. Tribol. Int. 31, 79–86 (1998).
5. Marshall, S. J., Bayne, S. C., Baier, R., Tomsia, A. P. & Marshall, G. W. A review of adhesion science. dental materials 26, e11–e16 (2010).
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献