Author:
Gholami Hamid,Mohammadifar Aliakbar,Bui Dieu Tien,Collins Adrian L.
Abstract
AbstractLand susceptibility to wind erosion hazard in Isfahan province, Iran, was mapped by testing 16 advanced regression-based machine learning methods: Robust linear regression (RLR), Cforest, Non-convex penalized quantile regression (NCPQR), Neural network with feature extraction (NNFE), Monotone multi-layer perception neural network (MMLPNN), Ridge regression (RR), Boosting generalized linear model (BGLM), Negative binomial generalized linear model (NBGLM), Boosting generalized additive model (BGAM), Spline generalized additive model (SGAM), Spike and slab regression (SSR), Stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), support vector machine (SVM), Relevance vector machine (RVM) and the Cubist and Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Thirteen factors controlling wind erosion were mapped, and multicollinearity among these factors was quantified using the tolerance coefficient (TC) and variance inflation factor (VIF). Model performance was assessed by RMSE, MAE, MBE, and a Taylor diagram using both training and validation datasets. The result showed that five models (MMLPNN, SGAM, Cforest, BGAM and SGB) are capable of delivering a high prediction accuracy for land susceptibility to wind erosion hazard. DEM, precipitation, and vegetation (NDVI) are the most critical factors controlling wind erosion in the study area. Overall, regression-based machine learning models are efficient techniques for mapping land susceptibility to wind erosion hazards.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E. & Gill, T. E. Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) absorbing aerosol product. Rev. Geophys. 40(1), 1–31 (2002).
2. Goossens, D. On-site and off-site effects of wind erosion. In Wind Erosion on Agricultural Land in Europe (ed. Warren, A.) 29–38 (Luxembourg, European Commission, 2003).
3. Dahmardeh Behrooz, R., Gholami, H., Telfer, M. W., Jansen, J. D. & Fathabadi, A. Uisng GLUE to pull apart the provenance of atmospheric dust. Aeolian Res. 37, 1–13 (2019).
4. Collins, A. L., Blackwell, M., Boeckx, P., Chivers, C. A., Emelko, M., Evrard, O., & Harris, P. Sediment source fingerprinting: benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes. J. Soils Sedim. 1–34 (2020).
5. Rashki, A., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Goudie, A. S. & Kahn, R. A. Dryness of ephemeral lakes and consequences for dust activity: The case of the Hamoun drainage basin, southeastern Iran. Sci. Total Environ. 463–464, 552–564 (2013).
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献