Abstract
AbstractCapture-mark-recapture/resight (CMR) methods are used for survival-rate studies, yet are often limited by small sample sizes. Advances in passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology have enabled passive detection or ‘resight’ of marked individuals using large antennas with greater read-ranges than previously possible. We used passively-detected resight data and CMR models to study survival rates of the southern bent-winged bat Miniopterus orianae bassanii, a critically endangered, cave-dwelling bat. Over three years, we used PIT-tagging to monitor 2966 individuals at the species’ largest breeding aggregation, using daily detection data (> 1.6 million detections) to estimate seasonal survival probabilities, structured by age, sex and reproductive status, and parameterise population projection matrices. This has hitherto been impossible using traditional CMR methods due to disturbance risk and low recapture rates. Bats exhibited lowest apparent seasonal survival over summer and autumn, particularly for reproductive females in summer (when lactating) and juveniles in autumn (after weaning), and high survival in winter. Lowest survival rates coincided with severe drought in summer–autumn 2016, suggesting that dry conditions affect population viability. Under all likely demographic assumptions, population projection matrices suggested the population is in deterministic decline, requiring urgent action to reduce extinction risk. Passively-collected resight data can now be used in combination with CMR models to provide extensive, robust information for targeted wildlife population management.
Funder
Australian Government Research Training Scholarship
Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
Australian Speleological Federation Karst Conservation Fund
Lirabenda Endowment Fund
South Australian Department of Environment and Water
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Odonnell, C. Population dynamics and survivorship in bats. In Ecology and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats (eds Kunz, T. H. & Parsons, S.) 158–176 (The Johns University Press, 2009).
2. Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J. & Anderson, D. R. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 67–118 (1992).
3. Gibbons, J. W. & Andrews, K. M. PIT tagging: Simple technology at its best. Bioscience 54, 447–454 (2004).
4. Ellison, L. E. et al. A comparison of conventional capture versus PIT reader techniques for estimating survival and capture probabilities of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Acta Chiropterologica 9, 149–160 (2007).
5. van Harten, E. et al. High detectability with low impact: Optimizing large PIT tracking systems for cave-dwelling bats. Ecol. Evol. 9, 10916–10928 (2019).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献