The influence of endurance exercise training on myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmogenesis in a coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis mouse model

Abstract

AbstractNonischaemic myocardial fibrosis is associated with cardiac dysfunction, malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. In the absence of a specific aetiology, its finding as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is often attributed to preceding viral myocarditis. Athletes presenting with ventricular arrhythmias often have nonischaemic LGE. Previous studies have demonstrated an adverse effect of exercise on the course of acute viral myocarditis. In this study, we have investigated, for the first time, the impact of endurance training on longer-term outcomes such as myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmogenicity in a murine coxsackievirus B3 (CVB)-induced myocarditis model. Male C57BL/6J mice (n = 72) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of forced treadmill running (EEX) or no exercise (SED). Myocarditis was induced 2 weeks later by a single intraperitoneal injection with CVB, versus vehicle in the controls (PBS). In a separate study, mice (n = 30) were subjected to pretraining for 13 weeks (preEEX), without continuation of exercise during myocarditis. Overall, continuation of exercise resulted in a milder clinical course of viral disease, with less weight loss and better preserved running capacity. CVB-EEX and preEEX-CVB mice tended to have a lower mortality rate. At sacrifice (i.e. 6 weeks after inoculation), the majority of virus was cleared from the heart. Histological assessment demonstrated prominent myocardial inflammatory infiltration and cardiomyocyte loss in both CVB groups. Inflammatory lesions in the CVB-EEX group contained higher numbers of pro-inflammatory cells (iNOS-reactive macrophages and CD8+ T lymphocytes) compared to these in CVB-SED. Treadmill running during myocarditis increased interstitial fibrosis [82.4% (CVB-EEX) vs. 56.3% (CVB-SED); P = 0.049]. Additionally, perivascular and/or interstitial fibrosis with extensive distribution was more likely to occur with exercise [64.7% and 64.7% (CVB-EEX) vs. 50% and 31.3% (CVB-SED); P = 0.048]. There was a numerical, but not significant, increase in the number of scars per cross-section (1.9 vs. 1.2; P = 0.195), with similar scar distribution and histological appearance in CVB-EEX and CVB-SED. In vivo electrophysiology studies did not induce sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, only nonsustained (usually polymorphic) runs. Their cumulative beat count and duration paralleled the increased fibrosis between CVB-EEX and CVB-SED, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.084 for each). Interestingly, in mice that were subjected to pretraining only without continuation of exercise during myocarditis, no differences between pretrained and sedentary mice were observed at sacrifice (i.e. 6 weeks after inoculation and training cessation) with regard to myocardial inflammation, fibrosis, and ventricular arrhythmogenicity. In conclusion, endurance exercise during viral myocarditis modulates the inflammatory process with more pro-inflammatory cells and enhances perivascular and interstitial fibrosis development. The impact on ventricular arrhythmogenesis requires further exploration.