Author:
Du Xiangbei,Xi Min,Kong Lingcong
Abstract
Abstract
Splitting nitrogen (N) application is beneficial for enhancing sweetpotato growth and promoting optimum yields under reduced N rates; however, studies concerning how split N can affect sweetpotato N dynamics and utilization are limited. Field experiments were conducted from 2015 to 2016 to determine how split N application affects sweetpotato N uptake and N use efficiency (NUE) under a reduced N rate. Two cultivars (Xushu 22 and Shangshu 19) were planted under four N treatments, a conventional basal application of 100 kg N ha−1 (100:0), a basal application of 80 kg N ha−1 (80:0), two equal split applications of 80 kg N ha−1 (basal and 35 days after transplanting, 40:40) and a N omission treatment (N0). Data from two years revealed that sweetpotato yields decreased at a reduced 20% N rate with a basal application (80:0); however, the reduced 20% N rate with a split application (40:40) significantly increased the yield by 16.6–19.0%. Although the 80:0 treatment decreased sweetpotato N uptake, the 40:40 treatment increased the N uptake by increasing the N uptake rate and prolonging the duration of the fast N uptake phase. In comparison to the basal application, the split N application used N more efficiently, showing consistently higher levels of agronomic use efficiency, recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency and partial factor productivity. NUEs under split N improved due to increased N uptake during the middle and late growth stages and a higher N partition ratio to the storage root. The above results indicate that split N application provides better N for crop developmental stages and is recommended as an alternative approach to simultaneously increasing storage root yield and NUE under a reduced N rate in sweetpotato production in China.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Ahn, Y. O. et al. Exogenous sucrose utilization and starch biosynthesis among sweet potato cultivars. Carbohyd. Res. 345, 55–60 (2010).
2. Marques, J. M. et al. Bacterial endophytes of sweet potato tuberous roots affected by the plant genotype and growth stage. J. Appl. Micro. 96, 273–281 (2015).
3. Shekhar, S., Mishra, D., Buragohain, A. K., Chakraborty, S. & Chakraborty, N. Comparative analysis of phytochemicals and nutrient availability in two contrasting cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Food Chem. 173, 957–965 (2015).
4. Lu, J. Z., Wang, X., Qin, J. J., Dai, Q. W. & Yi, Z. Y. Survey report on the development of sweetpotato planting industry in China (2017)–Analysis of fixed observation point data based on industrial sweet potato industry technology system. Jiangsu Agri. Sci. 46(23), 393–398 (In Chinese) (2018).
5. The nutrition action health letter from the center for science in the public interest. USA [http://www.cspinet.org/nah/].
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献