Author:
Gehrke Sergio Alexandre,Júnior Jaime Aramburú,Treichel Tiago Luis Eirles,do Prado Tales Dias,Dedavid Berenice Anina,de Aza Piedad N.
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the present in vivo study was to analyze and compare the effects on the crestal bone healing of two different implant macrogeometries installed in fresh socket areas and in normal bone areas with different insertion torque values. Two implant macrogeometries were used in the present study, DuoCone implant (DC) and Maestro implant (MAE), forming four groups: group DCws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group DCfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets); group MAEws, in which the implants were installed in healing bone (without a socket); group MAEfs, in which the implants were installed in post-extraction areas (fresh sockets). After 30 and 90 days of implantations in the bilateral mandibles of 10 sheep, eighty implants were evaluated through digital X-ray images and histologic slices. The crestal bone position in relation to the implant platform shoulder was measured and compared. The measured insertion torque was 47.2 ± 4.69 Ncm for the DCws group, 43.4 ± 4.87 Ncm for the DCfs group, 29.3 ± 3.16 Ncm for the MAEws group, and 27.7 ± 4.41 Ncm for the MAEfs group. The radiographic mesio-distal and histological bucco-lingual analyses showed significantly greater vertical bone loss in the implants installed with high torque (DC groups) in comparison to the implants installed with a low torque (MAE groups) (p < 0.05), at both evaluation times. In general, low insertion torque values (Maestro implants) showed better results of MBL when compared to implants installed with higher torque values (Duo Cone implants). Moreover, our results showed that the implants installed in the sites without sockets showed a less MBL in comparison with the implants installed in sites of fresh sockets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Araújo, M. G. & Lindhe, J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction: An experimental study in the dog. J. Clin. Periodontol. 32, 212–218 (2005).
2. Araújo, M. G. & Lindhe, J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: An experimental study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20, 545–549 (2009).
3. Araújo, M. G., Silva, C. O., Misawa, M. & Sukekava, F. Alveolar socket healing: What can we learn?. Periodontol. 2000(68), 122–134 (2015).
4. Pippi, R. Post-surgical clinical monitoring of soft tissue wound healing in periodontal and implant surgery. Int. J. Med. Sci. 14, 721–728 (2017).
5. Hansson, S. & Halldin, A. Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. J. Dent. Biomech. 3, 1758736012456543 (2012).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献