Abstract
AbstractMachine learning algorithms can be used for the prediction of nonnative sound classification based on crosslinguistic acoustic similarity. To date, very few linguistic studies have compared the classification accuracy of different algorithms. This study aims to assess how well machines align with human speech perception by assessing the ability of three machine learning algorithms, namely, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), decision tree (C5.0), and neural network (NNET), to predict the classification of second language (L2) sounds in terms of first language (L1) categories. The models were trained using the first three formants and duration of L1 vowels and fed with the same acoustic features of L2 vowels. To validate their accuracy, adult L2 speakers completed a perceptual classification task. The results indicated that NNET predicted with success the classification of all L2 vowels with the highest proportion in terms of L1 categories, while LDA and C5.0 missed only one vowel each. Furthermore, NNET exhibited superior accuracy in predicting the full range of above chance responses, followed closely by LDA. C5.0 did not meet the anticipated performance levels. The findings can hold significant implications for advancing both the theoretical and practical frameworks of speech acquisition.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Flege, J. E. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (ed. Strange, W.) 233–277 (York Press, 1995).
2. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress, 3–83.
3. Best, C. T. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New Directions in Research and Theory. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (ed. Strange, W.) 171–204 (York Press, 1995).
4. Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (eds Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J.) 13–34 (John Benjamins, 2007).
5. Escudero, P. Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In Phonology in Perception (eds Boersma, P. & Hamann, S.) 151–190 (Mouton de Gruyter, 2009).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献