Abstract
AbstractData on the SARS-CoV-2 infection among primary health care workers (PHCWs) are scarce but essential to reflect on policy regarding prevention and control measures. We assessed the prevalence of PHCWs who have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with modeling from the general population in metropolitan France, and associated factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted among general practitioners (GPs), pediatricians, dental and pharmacy workers in primary care between May and August 2021. Participants volunteered to provide a dried-blood spot for SARS-CoV-2 antibody assessment and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was defined as the detection of infection-induced antibodies (anti-nucleocapsid IgG, and for non-vaccinees: anti-Spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies) or previous self-reported infection (positive RT-qPCR or antigenic test, or positive ELISA test before vaccination). Estimates were adjusted using weights for representativeness and compared with prediction from the general population. Poisson regressions were used to quantify associated factors. The analysis included 1612 PHCWs. Weighted prevalences were: 31.7% (95% CI 27.5–36.0) for GPs, 28.7% (95% CI 24.4–33.0) for pediatricians, 25.2% (95% CI 20.6–31.0) for dentists, and 25.5% (95% CI 18.2–34.0) for pharmacists. Estimates were compatible with model predictions for the general population. PHCWs more likely to be infected were: GPs compared to pharmacist assistants (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 2.26; CI 95% 1.01–5.07), those living in Île-de-France (aPR = 1.53; CI 95% 1.14–2.05), South-East (aPR = 1.57; CI 95% 1.19–2.08), North-East (aPR = 1.81; CI 95% 1.38–2.37), and those having an unprotected contact with a COVID-19 case within the household (aPR = 1.48; CI 95% 1.22–1.80). Occupational factors were not associated with infection. In conclusion, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure for PHCWs was more likely to have occurred in the community rather than at their workplace.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. World Health Organization. The impact of COVID-19 on health and care workers: a closer look at deaths. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HWF-WorkingPaper-2021.1 (Accessed on 8 January 2024).
2. Lancet, T. COVID-19: Protecting health-care workers. Lancet 395, 922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30644-9 (2020).
3. Galanis, P., Vraka, I., Fragkou, D., Bilali, A. & Kaitelidou, D. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and associated factors in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hosp. Infect. 108, 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.008 (2021).
4. Kayı, İ et al. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among health care workers before the era of vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27, 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.036 (2021).
5. Chen, X. et al. Serological evidence of human infection with SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 9, e598–e609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00026-7 (2021).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献