Male recognition bias in sex assignment based on visual stimuli

Author:

Federici StefanoORCID,Lepri AlessandroORCID,Bacci SilviaORCID,Bartolucci FrancescoORCID

Abstract

AbstractAccording to previous ethnomethodological and cognitive studies on sex assignment, if a figure has male sexual characteristics people are more likely to think it is a man than they think it is a woman when the figure has female sexual characteristics. This bias in favor of male attribution is strongly reinforced when a penis is apparent in human nude pictures. In our contribution, we reported findings of three experiments aimed at replicating previous studies by administering the Sex/Gender Attribution Test for Adult (SGAT-A) created by digitally morphing the bodies of one human male and one human female model into realistic pictures. We observed the sex attribution and response time of 1706 young adult participants. A cross-cultural comparison was also carried out with a sample of young adult Chinese students. Findings substantially reconfirmed those obtained in previous studies. The male external genitalia overshadow any other features that might rather suggest a female identity. Indeed, when male external genitalia were exposed, the odds of male sex attribution were 5.688 compared to 1.823 female attribution when female external genitalia were shown. Moreover, the shortest response times were observed with masculine stimuli. Evolutionary and cultural determinants of the male sex bias are also discussed.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (eds Barkow, J. H. et al.) 19–136 (Oxford University Press, 1992).

2. Bazarra-Fernandez, A. In Handbook on Sexuality: Perspectives, Issues and Role in Society (eds Peterson, N. E. & Campbell, W.) 213–225 (Nova Science, 2012).

3. Coen, S. & Banister, E. (eds) What a Difference Sex and Gender Make: A Gender, Sex and Health Research Casebook (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2012).

4. Heidari, S., Babor, T. F., De Castro, P., Tort, S. & Curno, M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6 (2016).

5. Symons, D. The Evolution of Human Sexuality (Oxford University Press, 1981).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3