Author:
Machado Ricardo,Pamplona Gabriel Filipe,de Souza Júnior Claudemir,Nascimento Jaqueline,Back Eduardo Donato Eing Elgelke,Comparin Daniel,Ignácio Sérgio Aparecido,Reinke Stella Maria Glaci,Kovalik Ana Cristina,da Silva Neto Ulisses Xavier
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this observational clinical study (OCS) was to determine the clinical anatomical diameter (CAD) in several dental groups, thus correlating them with gender, age, tooth/canal and pulpoperiradicular diagnosis. Three-hundred fifty-nine teeth/584 vital or necrotic root canals from patients of both genders and different ages composed the sample. After performing the necessary previous procedures, K-Flexofiles were used to determine the CAD. Then, the gender and age of the patients, as well as the pulpoperiradicular diagnosis of the teeth were tabulated to conduct the statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Of the 359 teeth/584 root canals evaluated, 208/342 were from women (mean age 38.85 ± 13.42 years) and 151/242 were from men (mean age 45.41 ± 14.90 years). Statistically significant differences between the CAD means of root canals from women and men were not identified (p = 0.411). The analysis of the correlation between the CAD and age also showed a total independence (p = 0.271). Teeth with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosed radiographically (TPNAAPDR) had a significantly larger CAD mean than teeth with pulp necrosis and no asymptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosed radiographically (TPNNAAPDR) and teeth with vital pulp and normal apical tissues (TVPNAT) (p = 0.0297); and the last two did not differ statistically (p > 0.05). The largest CAD mean was observed in single canals of maxillary central incisors. The lowest values of this variable were identified in the mesiobuccal and mesial canals of maxillary and mandibular first molars, respectively. The CAD of the root canals was influenced only by the root canal/tooth and pulpoperiradicular diagnosis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Ørstavik, D. Essential Endodontology: Prevention and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis 3rd edn. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2020).
2. Beach, D. A. Advances in biomechanical preparation. Dent. Today 36(86), 88–89 (2017).
3. Sjogren, U., Hagglund, B., Sundqvist, G. & Wing, K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J. Endod. 16, 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4 (1990).
4. Sjogren, U., Figdor, D., Persson, S. & Sundqvist, G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int. Endod. J. 30, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00092.x (1997).
5. Seltzer, S., Bender, I. B. & Turkenkopf, S. Factors affecting successful repair after root canal therapy. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 67, 651–662. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1963.0349 (1963).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献