Author:
Dunbar Dawn,Babayan Simon A.,Krumrie Sarah,Haining Hayley,Hosie Margaret J.,Weir William
Abstract
AbstractFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a severe feline coronavirus-associated syndrome in cats, which is invariably fatal without anti-viral treatment. In the majority of non-effusive FIP cases encountered in practice, confirmatory diagnostic testing is not undertaken and reliance is given to the interpretation of valuable, but essentially non-specific, clinical signs and laboratory markers. We hypothesised that it may be feasible to develop a machine learning (ML) approach which may be applied to the analysis of clinical data to aid in the diagnosis of disease. A dataset encompassing 1939 suspected FIP cases was scored for clinical suspicion of FIP on the basis of history, signalment, clinical signs and laboratory results, using published guidelines, comprising 683 FIP (35.2%), and 1256 non-FIP (64.8%) cases. This dataset was used to train, validate and evaluate two diagnostic machine learning ensemble models. These models, which analysed signalment and laboratory data alone, allowed the accurate discrimination of FIP and non-FIP cases in line with expert opinion. To evaluate whether these models may have value as a diagnostic tool, they were applied to a collection of 80 cases for which the FIP status had been confirmed (FIP: n = 58 (72.5%), non–FIP: n = 22 (27.5%)). Both ensemble models detected FIP with an accuracy of 97.5%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.969, sensitivity of 95.45% and specificity of 98.28%. This work demonstrates that, in principle, ML can be usefully applied to the diagnosis of non-effusive FIP. Further work is required before ML may be deployed in the laboratory as a diagnostic tool, such as training models on datasets of confirmed cases and accounting for inter-laboratory variation. Nevertheless, these results illustrate the potential benefit of applying ML to standardising and accelerating the interpretation of clinical pathology data, thereby improving the diagnostic utility of existing laboratory tests.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Pedersen, N. C. An update on feline infectious peritonitis: Diagnostics and therapeutics. Vet. J. 201, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.04.016 (2014).
2. Weiss, R. C. & Scott, F. W. Pathogenesis of feline infetious peritonitis: Pathologic changes and immunofluorescence. Am. J. Vet. Res. 42, 2036–2048 (1981).
3. Cave, T. A., Golder, M. C., Simpson, J. & Addie, D. D. Risk factors for feline coronavirus seropositivity in cats relinquished to a UK rescue charity. J. Feline Med. Surg. 6, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2004.01.003 (2004).
4. Felten, S. et al. Correlation of feline coronavirus shedding in feces with coronavirus antibody titer. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080598 (2020).
5. Taylor. S., T. S., Gunn-Moore. D., Barker. E, and Sorrell. S. An update on treatment of feline infectious peritonitis in the UK. https://www.vettimes.co.uk/article/an-update-on-treatment-of-feline-infectious-peritonitis-in-the-uk (2022).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献