Author:
Mathur Rajshree,Sharma Meena Kumari,Loganathan K.,Abbas Mohamed,Hussain Shaik,Kataria Gaurav,Alqahtani Mohammed S.,Srinivas Rao Koppula
Abstract
AbstractThe present research aims to predict effluent soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) in anaerobic digestion (AD) process using machine-learning based approach. Anaerobic digestion is a highly sensitive process and depends upon several environmental and operational factors, such as temperature, flow, and load. Therefore, predicting output characteristics using modeling is important not only for process monitoring and control, but also to reduce the operating cost of the treatment plant. It is difficult to predict COD in a real time mode, so it is better to use Complex Mathematical Modeling (CMM) for simulating AD process and forecasting output parameters. Therefore, different Machine Learning algorithms, such as Linear Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest and Artificial Neural Networks, have been used for predicting effluent SCOD using data acquired from in situ anaerobic wastewater treatment system. The result of the predicted data using different algorithms were compared with experimental data of anaerobic system. It was observed that the Artificial Neural Networks is the most effective simulation technique that correlated with the experimental data with the mean absolute percentage error of 10.63 and R2 score of 0.96. This research proposes an efficient and reliable integrated modeling method for early prediction of the water quality in wastewater treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Alex, J., Beteau, J. F., Copp, J. B., Hellinga, C., Jeppsson, U., Marsili-Libelli, S., Pons, M. N., Spanjers, H., & Vanhooren, H. Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants. European Control Conference, 3746–3751 IEEE (1999).
2. Kalyuzhnyi, S. V. & Fedorovich, V. V. Mathematical modelling of competition between sulphate reduction and methanogenesis in anaerobic reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 65(3), 227–242 (1998).
3. Kleerebezem, R. & Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Waste characterization for implementation in ADM1. Water Sci. Technol. 54(4), 167–174 (2006).
4. Batstone, D. J., Keller, J. & Steyer, J. P. A review of ADM1 extensions, applications, and analysis: 2002–2005. Water Sci. Technol. 54(4), 1–10 (2006).
5. Pavlostathis, S. G. & Gomez, E. G. Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review. Anaerobic biological treatment processes. Taylor & Francis, Online 21, 411–490 (2009).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献