Author:
Hohenstein Jess,Kizilcec Rene F.,DiFranzo Dominic,Aghajari Zhila,Mieczkowski Hannah,Levy Karen,Naaman Mor,Hancock Jeffrey,Jung Malte F.
Abstract
AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is already widely used in daily communication, but despite concerns about AI’s negative effects on society the social consequences of using it to communicate remain largely unexplored. We investigate the social consequences of one of the most pervasive AI applications, algorithmic response suggestions (“smart replies”), which are used to send billions of messages each day. Two randomized experiments provide evidence that these types of algorithmic recommender systems change how people interact with and perceive one another in both pro-social and anti-social ways. We find that using algorithmic responses changes language and social relationships. More specifically, it increases communication speed, use of positive emotional language, and conversation partners evaluate each other as closer and more cooperative. However, consistent with common assumptions about the adverse effects of AI, people are evaluated more negatively if they are suspected to be using algorithmic responses. Thus, even though AI can increase the speed of communication and improve interpersonal perceptions, the prevailing anti-social connotations of AI undermine these potential benefits if used overtly.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R. & Moore, R. K. Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 30, 457–500 (2007).
2. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R. & Niederhoffer, K. G. Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 547–577 (2003).
3. Zhang, J. et al. Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.05345 (2018).
4. Stone, P. et al. Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030. In: One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015–2016 Study Panel. Tech. Rep., Stanford University (2016).
5. Rahwan, I. et al. Machine behaviour. Nature 568, 477–486 (2019).
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献