People overlook subtractive changes differently depending on age, culture, and task

Author:

Juvrud Joshua,Myers Laurence,Nyström Pär

Abstract

AbstractPrevious work has explored transformative strategies that adds or removes components to change an original structure or state, and showed that adults tend to search for additive solutions far more often than subtractive ones. In the current study, we replicated a Lego building task and a grid-based symmetry task from a previous study, and also introduced a novel digital puzzle task. We investigated limitations in the previous study as well as extended the investigation of the subtraction neglect in a sample of children and across two cultures. Results partially confirm previous results, and extends the literature by showing that 9–10 year old children were more likely to ignore subtractive transformations than adults. However, we found both task-based and cultural variations in strategy use in adults from Sweden and the USA. We conclude that a subtraction neglect involves complex cognitive processes that are dependent on the task, culture, and age.

Funder

Uppsala University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Harnishfeger, K. K. & Bjorklund, D. F. Children’s strategies: A brief history. In Children’s Strategies: Contemporary Views of Cognitive Development (eds Harnishfeger, K. K. & Bjorklund, D. F.) 1–22 (Psychology Press, 1990).

2. Cohen, M. Preschoolers’ practical thinking and problem solving: The acquisition of an optimal solution strategy. Cognit. Dev. 11(3), 357–373 (1996).

3. Adams, G. S., Converse, B. A., Hales, A. H. & Klotz, L. E. People systematically overlook subtractive changes. Nature 592(7853), 258–261 (2021).

4. Chomsky, N. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (eds Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J.) (MIT Press, 1993).

5. Lewis, H. M. & Laland, K. N. Transmission fidelity is the key to the build-up of cumulative culture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367(1599), 2171–2180 (2012).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3