First trimester abortion protocols by facility type in Switzerland and potential barriers to accessing the service

Author:

Eckstein Samuel Martin,von Felten Stefanie,Perotto Laura,Brun Romana,Vorburger DeniseORCID

Abstract

AbstractSimplified first-trimester abortion protocols are well established. However, data on the use of medical or surgical abortion protocols across Switzerland is lacking. We report protocol characteristics in abortion care for two different facility types, hospital vs private practices (office-based) in Switzerland. Furthermore, we investigate an association between protocol characteristics and the likelihood of following through with the abortion at the same facility. We also report abortion outcomes of an office-based cohort where doctors use simplified abortion protocols. This study consists of two parts. (i) Between April and July, 2019, we collected data regarding medical and surgical abortion protocols of institutions offering abortions, in a nationwide survey. We assessed whether the proportion of patients who followed through with the abortion (primary outcome) after first appointment was associated with predefined protocol characteristics, considered to complicate access to abortion services, using generalised estimating equations. (ii) We analysed abortion outcomes of six selected office-based facilities from January, 2008, to December, 2018, using simplified abortion protocols in accordance with the Worlds Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. (i) We included a total of 39 institutions. Hospitals showed more protocol-based barriers to abortion access compared with office-based facilities. The odds of undergoing an abortion after the first appointment were increased using protocols with minimal barriers. Overall, office-based facilities applied higher gestational age limits, required fewer appointments, and administered mifepristone more often after the first visit than did hospitals. (ii) We included a total of 5274 patients with an incidence of complications requiring surgery of 2.5% in line with rates reported in published literature. Only a few hospitals provide abortion care with easy access to medical and surgical abortion, whereas most office-based facilities do. Access to abortion services is generally crucial, and should be provided in a single visit whenever clinically permissible.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference37 articles.

1. WHO. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems, 2nd edn. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70914/9789241548434_eng.pdf (2012).

2. Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch StGB, Swiss Criminal Code. https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/filestore/fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/54/757_781_799/20200701/de/pdf-a/fedlex-data-admin-ch-eli-cc-54-757_781_799-20200701-de-pdf-a.pdf (2020) (15 August 2021).

3. Abortion. Federal Office of Statistics. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/gesundheit/gesundheitszustand/reproduktive/schwangerschaftsabbrueche.html.

4. Mifepristonum. Swissmedic-Agency for Regulation of Prescription Drugs. https://compendium.ch/product/1005481-mifegyne-tabl-200-mg/mpro (1999).

5. Renteria, S.-C. et al. Expertenbrief No 65 Medikamentöer Schwangerschaftsabbruch im ersten Trimester. https://www.sggg.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/65_Medikamentoeser_Schwangerschaftsabbruch_im_ersten_Trimester.pdf (2020) (25 May 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3