Abstract
AbstractProstate cancer (PCa) diagnosis on multi-parametric magnetic resonance images (MRI) requires radiologists with a high level of expertise. Misalignments between the MRI sequences can be caused by patient movement, elastic soft-tissue deformations, and imaging artifacts. They further increase the complexity of the task prompting radiologists to interpret the images. Recently, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools have demonstrated potential for PCa diagnosis typically relying on complex co-registration of the input modalities. However, there is no consensus among research groups on whether CAD systems profit from using registration. Furthermore, alternative strategies to handle multi-modal misalignments have not been explored so far. Our study introduces and compares different strategies to cope with image misalignments and evaluates them regarding to their direct effect on diagnostic accuracy of PCa. In addition to established registration algorithms, we propose ‘misalignment augmentation’ as a concept to increase CAD robustness. As the results demonstrate, misalignment augmentations can not only compensate for a complete lack of registration, but if used in conjunction with registration, also improve the overall performance on an independent test set.
Funder
DKFZ International Scholarship Program
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Helmholtz Imaging
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Lomas, D. J. & Ahmed, H. U. All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0332-z (2020).
2. Tewari, A. K., Whelan, P. & Graham, J. D. Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis and Clinical Management (Wiley, 2013).
3. Vilanova, J. C., Catalá, V., Algaba, F. & Laucirica, O. Atlas of Multiparametric Prostate MRI: With PI-RADS Approach and Anatomic-MRI-Pathological Correlation (Springer, 2018).
4. Rosenkrantz, A. B. MRI of the Prostate: A Practical Approach (Thieme, 2016).
5. Weinreb, J. C. et al. PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur. Urol. 69, 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 (2016).