Author:
Yang Dan-dan,Li Yi,Tian Jiang-yu,Li Ya,Liu Jian,Liu Yun-song,Cao Xin-wen,Liu Chuan
Abstract
AbstractTo investigate the application of MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score in assessing bone mineral density (BMD) for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We reviewed the data of AIS patients between January 2021 and October 2023 with MRI, whole-spine plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and general information. VBQ score was calculated using T1-weighted MRI. Univariate analysis was applied to present the differences between variables of patients with normal BMD group (QCT Z-score > − 2.0) and low BMD group (QCT Z-score ≤ − 2.0). The correlation between VBQ score and QCT Z-score was analyzed with Pearson correlation test. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the independent factors related to low BMD. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to analyze the diagnostic performance of VBQ score in distinguishing low BMD. A total of 136 AIS patients (mean age was 14.84 ± 2.10 years) were included, of which 41 had low BMD. The low BMD group had a significantly higher VBQ score than that in normal group (3.48 ± 0.85 vs. 2.62 ± 0.62, P < 0.001). The VBQ score was significantly negative correlated with QCT Z score (r = − 0.454, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, VBQ score was independently associated with low BMD (OR: 4.134, 95% CI 2.136–8.000, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve indicated that the diagnostic accuracy of the VBQ score for predicting low BMD was 81%. A sensitivity of 65.9% with a specificity of 88.4% could be achieved for distinguishing low BMD by setting the VBQ score cutoff as 3.18. The novel VBQ score was a promising tool in distinguishing low BMD in patients with AIS and could be useful as opportunistic assessment for screening and complementary evaluation to QCT before surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Lonstein, J. E. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 344, 1407–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90572-x (1994).
2. Burwell, R. G. Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pediatr. Rehabil. 6, 137–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490310001642757 (2003).
3. Wang, W. J. et al. Top theories for the etiopathogenesis of adolescent. idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 31, S14–S27. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f73c12 (2011).
4. Nemani, V. M., Blakemore, L. C., Karol, L. A., Green, D. W. & Widmann, R. F. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Update on bracing, surgical techniques, and patient safety. Instr. Course Lect. 66, 481–494 (2017).
5. McCoy, S., Tundo, F., Chidambaram, S. & Baaj, A. A. Clinical considerations for spinal surgery in the osteoporotic patient: A comprehensive review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 180, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.03.010 (2019).