Author:
Schneider Judith,Mas-Carrió Eduard,Jan Catherine,Miquel Christian,Taberlet Pierre,Michaud Katarzyna,Fumagalli Luca
Abstract
AbstractStomach content analyses are a valuable tool in human forensic science to interpret perimortem events. While the identification of food components of plant and animal origin has traditionally been conducted by macro- and microscopical approaches in case of incomplete digestion, molecular methods provide the potential to increase sensitivity and taxonomic resolution. In particular, DNA metabarcoding (PCR-amplification and next generation sequencing of complex DNA mixtures) has seen a rapid growth in the field of wildlife ecology to assess species’ diets from faecal and gastric samples. Despite clear advantages, molecular approaches have not yet been established in routine human forensics to investigate the last meal components of deceased persons. In this pilot study we applied for the first time a DNA metabarcoding approach to assess both plant and vertebrate components of 48 human stomach content samples taken during medicolegal autopsies. We obtained a final dataset with 34 vertebrate and 124 vegetal unique sequences, that were clustered to 9 and 33 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), respectively. Our results suggest that this approach can provide crucial information about circumstances preceding death, and open promising perspectives for biomedical dietary surveys based on digested food items found in the gastrointestinal tract.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Legge, C. M., Payne‐James, J. J., Puntis, J. W. & Short, S. L. Postmortem gastric content analysis. In Current Practice in Forensic Medicine Vol. 2 (ed J. A. M. Gall and J. J. Payne‐James) 47–66 (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).
2. Miller, J. Forensic Botany and Stomach Content Analysis: Established Practice and Innovation. In Taphonomy of Human Remains: Forensic Analysis of the Dead and the Depositional Environment (eds E. M. J. Schotsmans, N. Márquez‐Grant, & S. L. Forbes) 187–200 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2017).
3. Tröger, H. D., Baur, C. & Spann, K. W. Mageninhalt und Todeszeitbestimmung. (Schmidt-Römhild, 1987).
4. Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. & Willerslev, E. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2045–2050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x (2012).
5. Deagle, B. E., Eveson, J. P. & Jarman, S. N. Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples–a case study on DNA in faeces. Front. Zool. 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-11 (2006).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献