Author:
Merkher Yulia,Kontareva Elizaveta,Bogdan Elizaveta,Achkasov Konstantin,Maximova Ksenia,Grolman Joshua M.,Leonov Sergey
Abstract
AbstractMetastasis is the main cause of cancer-related mortality; therefore, the ability to predict its propensity can remarkably affect survival rate. Metastasis development is predicted nowadays by lymph-node status, tumor size, histopathology, and genetic testing. However, all these methods may have inaccuracies, and some require weeks to complete. Identifying novel prognostic markers will open an essential source for risk prediction, possibly guiding to elevated patient treatment by personalized strategies. Cancer cell invasion is a critical step in metastasis. The cytoskeletal mechanisms used by metastatic cells for the invasion process are very similar to the utilization of actin cytoskeleton in the endocytosis process. In the current study, the adhesion and encapsulation efficiency of low-cost carboxylate-modified fluorescent nanoparticles by breast cancer cells with high (HM) and low metastatic potential (LM) have been evaluated; benign cells were used as control. Using high-content fluorescence imaging and analysis, we have revealed (within a short time of 1 h), that efficiency of nanoparticles adherence and encapsulation is sufficiently higher in HM cells compared to LM cells, while benign cells are not encapsulating or adhering the particles during experiment time at all. We have utilized custom-made automatic image analysis algorithms to find quantitative co-localization (Pearson’s coefficients) of the nanoparticles with the imaged cells. The method proposed here is straightforward; it does not require especial equipment or expensive materials nor complicated cell manipulations, it may be potentially applicable for various cells, including patient-derived cells. Effortless and quantitative determination of the metastatic likelihood has the potential to be performed using patient-specific biopsy/surgery sample, which will directly influence the choice of protocols for cancer patient’s treatment and, as a result, increase their life expectancy.
Funder
Russian Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Yang, J. & Weinberg, R. A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: At the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev. Cell 14, 818–829 (2008).
2. Cairns, R. A., Khokha, R. & Hill, R. P. Molecular mechanisms of tumor invasion and metastasis: An integrated view. Curr. Mol. Med. 3, 659–671 (2003).
3. Sleeman, J. P., Nazarenko, I. & Thiele, W. Do all roads lead to Rome? Routes to metastasis development. Int. J. Cancer 128, 2511–2526 (2011).
4. Weigelt, B., Peterse, J. L. & van’t Veer, L. J. Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 591–602 (2005).
5. Mohler, J. L., Partin, A. W., Isaacs, J. T. & Coffey, D. S. Metastatic potential prediction by a visual grading system of cell motility: prospective validation in the Dunning R-3327 prostatic adenocarcinoma model. Cancer Res. 48, 4312–4317 (1988).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献