Author:
Johann Till Jonas Frederick,Marzolino Ugo
Abstract
AbstractEntanglement is one of the strongest quantum correlation, and is a key ingredient in fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics and a resource for quantum technologies. While entanglement theory is well settled for distinguishable particles, there are five inequivalent approaches to entanglement of indistinguishable particles. We analyse the different definitions of indistinguishable particle entanglement in the light of the locality notion. This notion is specified by two steps: (i) the identification of subsystems by means of their local operators; (ii) the requirement that entanglement represent correlations between the above subsets of operators. We prove that three of the aforementioned five entanglement definitions are incompatible with any locality notion defined as above.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Bell, M. & Gao, S. (eds) Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell’s Theorem (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
2. Buhrman, H., Cleve, R., Massar, S. & de Wolf, R. Nonlocality and communication complexity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 665 (2010).
3. Braun, D. et al. Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035006 (2018).
4. Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with quantum states of light. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 367 (2019).
5. Lund, A. . P., Bremner, M. . J. & Ralph, T. . C. Quantum sampling problems, BosonSampling and quantum supremacy. npj Quantum Inf. 3, 15 (2017).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献