Author:
Gopi Pasala,Alluraiah N. Chinna,Kumar Pujari Harish,Bajaj Mohit,Blazek Vojtech,Prokop Lukas
Abstract
AbstractLoad frequency control (LFC) plays a critical role in ensuring the reliable and stable operation of power plants and maintaining a quality power supply to consumers. In control engineering, an oscillatory behavior exhibited by a system in response to control actions is referred to as “Porpoising”. This article focused on investigating the causes of the porpoising phenomenon in the context of LFC. This paper introduces a novel methodology for enhancing the performance of load frequency controllers in power systems by employing rat swarm optimization (RSO) for tuning and detecting the porpoising feature to ensure stability. The study focuses on a single-area thermal power generating station (TPGS) subjected to a 1% load demand change, employing MATLAB simulations for analysis. The proposed RSO-based PID controller is compared against traditional methods such as the firefly algorithm (FFA) and Ziegler-Nichols (ZN) technique. Results indicate that the RSO-based PID controller exhibits superior performance, achieving zero frequency error, reduced negative peak overshoot, and faster settling time compared to other methods. Furthermore, the paper investigates the porpoising phenomenon in PID controllers, analyzing the location of poles in the s-plane, damping ratio, and control actions. The RSO-based PID controller demonstrates enhanced stability and resistance to porpoising, making it a promising solution for power system control. Future research will focus on real-time implementation and broader applications across different control systems.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports
Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Ziegler, J. G. & Nichols, N. B. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME 64, 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2899060 (1942).
2. Gopi, P. & Reddy, P. L. Design of robust load frequency controller for multi-area interconnected power system using SDO software. J. Electr. Eng. 15(4), 118–126 (2015).
3. Åström, K. J. & Hägglund, T. The future of PID control. Control Eng. Pract. 9, 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00062-4 (2002).
4. Gopi, P., Mahdavi, M. & Alhelou, H. H. Robustness and stability analysis of automatic voltage regulator using disk-based stability analysis. IEEE Open Access J. Power Energy 10, 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1109/OAJPE.2023.3344750 (2023).
5. Patil, R. S., Jadhav, S. P. & Patil, M. D. Review of intelligent and nature-inspired algorithms-based methods for tuning PID controllers in industrial applications. J. Robot. Control (JRC) 5(2), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v5i2.20850 (2024).