Author:
Eftedal Nikolai Haahjem,Kleppestø Thomas Haarklau,Czajkowski Nikolai Olavi,Sheehy-Skeffington Jennifer,Røysamb Espen,Vassend Olav,Ystrom Eivind,Thomsen Lotte
Abstract
AbstractInjustice typically involves some people benefitting at the expense of others. An opportunist might then be selectively motivated to amend only the injustice that is harmful to them, while someone more principled would respond consistently regardless of whether they stand to gain or lose. Here, we disentangle such principled and opportunistic motives towards injustice. With a sample of 312 monozygotic- and 298 dizygotic twin pairs (N = 1220), we measured people’s propensity to perceive injustice as victims, observers, beneficiaries, and perpetrators of injustice, using the Justice Sensitivity scale. With a biometric approach to factor analysis, that provides increased stringency in inferring latent psychological traits, we find evidence for two substantially heritable factors explaining correlations between Justice Sensitivity facets. We interpret these factors as principled justice sensitivity (h2 = 0.45) leading to increased sensitivity to injustices of all categories, and opportunistic justice sensitivity (h2 = 0.69) associated with increased sensitivity to being a victim and a decreased propensity to see oneself as a perpetrator. These novel latent constructs share genetic substrate with psychological characteristics that sustain broad coordination strategies that capture the dynamic tension between honest cooperation versus dominance and defection, namely altruism, interpersonal trust, agreeableness, Social Dominance Orientation and opposition to immigration and foreign aid.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. (Harvard University Press, 1971/2009).
2. Smith, A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. (Penguin, 1759/2010).
3. Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature. (Courier Corporation, 1739/2012).
4. Firth, R. Ethical absolutism and the ideal observer. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 12(3), 317–345 (1952).
5. Wilson, E. O. The biological basis of morality. Atl. Mon. 281(4), 53–70 (1998).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献