Abstract
AbstractEstimated at 2.6 million annually, stillbirths worldwide have stayed alarmingly high, in contrast to neonatal and under-five mortality rates. It is a neglected public health challenge globally, with less attention to its social determinants. We examined spatial patterns of country-level stillbirth rates and determined the influence of social determinants of health on spatial patterns of stillbirth rates. We also estimated probabilistic relationships between stillbirth rates and significant determinants from the spatial analysis. Using country-level aggregated data from the United Nations databases, it employed ecological spatial analysis and artificial intelligence modeling based on Bayesian network among 194 World Health Organization member countries. From the spatial analysis, thirty-seven countries formed a cluster of high values (hot-spots) for stillbirth and 13 countries formed a cluster of low values (cold-spots). In the multivariate regression, gender inequality and anaemia in pregnancy were significantly associated with spatial patterns of higher stillbirth rates, while higher antenatal care (ANC) coverage and skilled birth attendants during delivery were associated with clusters of lower stillbirth rates. The Bayesian network model suggests strong dependencies between stillbirth rate and gender inequality index, geographic regions and skilled birth attendants during delivery. The Bayesian network predicted that the probability of low stillbirth rate increased from 56% to 100% when the percentage of countries with high skilled birth attendants during delivery increased from 70% to 88%, high ANC coverage increased from 55% to 70%, high prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy decreased from 27% to 11% and high gender inequality index decreased from 43% to 21%. Recognizing the urgency in reducing stillbirths globally, multi-pronged strategies should be designed to promote gender equality and strengthen the reproductive and maternal health services in Africa, Eastern Mediterranean, South Eastern Asia, and other countries with disproportionately high stillbirth rates.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health: Stillbirths. WHO (2016). Available at, https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/epidemiology/stillbirth/en/, (Accessed: 20th February 2019).
2. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory: Indicator Metadata Registry. (2016). Available at, http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.wrapper.imr?x-id=2444, (Accessed: 20th February 2019).
3. Lawn, J. E. et al. 3.2 million stillbirths: epidemiology and overview of the evidence review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9(Suppl 1), S2 (2009).
4. Lawn, J. E. et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 387, 587–603 (2016).
5. Lawn, J. E. et al. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet (London, England) 377, 1448–63 (2011).
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献