Author:
McDouall Alice,Zhou Kelly Q.,Davies Anthony,Wassink Guido,Jones Timothy L. M.,Bennet Laura,Gunn Alistair J.,Davidson Joanne O.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The optimal rate to rewarm infants after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear. In this study we examined whether slow rewarming after 72 h of hypothermia would attenuate white matter injury.
Methods
Near-term fetal sheep received sham occlusion (n = 8) or cerebral ischemia for 30 min, followed by normothermia (n = 7) or hypothermia from 3–72 h, with either spontaneous fast rewarming (n = 8) within 1 h, or slow rewarming at ~0.5 °C/h (n = 8) over 10 h. Fetuses were euthanized 7 days later.
Results
Ischemia was associated with loss of total and mature oligodendrocytes, reduced expression of myelin proteins and induction of microglia and astrocytes, compared with sham controls (P < 0.05). Both hypothermia protocols were associated with a significant increase in numbers of total and mature oligodendrocytes, area fraction of myelin proteins and reduced numbers of microglia and astrocytes, compared with ischemia-normothermia (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the number of oligodendrocytes, microglia or astrocytes or expression of myelin proteins between fast and slow rewarming after hypothermia.
Conclusion
The rate of rewarming after a clinically relevant duration of hypothermia had no apparent effect on white matter protection by hypothermia after cerebral ischemia in near-term fetal sheep.
Impact
Persistent white matter injury is a major contributor to long-term disability after neonatal encephalopathy despite treatment with therapeutic hypothermia.
The optimal rate to rewarm infants after therapeutic hypothermia is unclear; current protocols were developed on a precautionary basis.
We now show that slow rewarming at 0.5 °C/h did not improve histological white matter injury compared with rapid spontaneous rewarming after a clinically established duration of hypothermia in near-term fetal sheep.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC