Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group

Published:2023-06-05 Issue:10 Volume:20 Page:696-714
ISSN:1759-5002
Container-title:Nature Reviews Cardiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Nat Rev Cardiol

Author:

Mézquita Aldo J. Vázquez^ORCID,Biavati Federico,Falk Volkmar^ORCID,Alkadhi Hatem^ORCID,Hajhosseiny Reza,Maurovich-Horvat Pál,Manka Robert,Kozerke Sebastian,Stuber Matthias,Derlin Thorsten^ORCID,Channon Keith M.,Išgum Ivana^ORCID,Coenen Adriaan,Foellmer Bernhard^ORCID,Dey Damini^ORCID,Volleberg Rick H. J. A.^ORCID,Meinel Felix G.,Dweck Marc R.,Piek Jan J.^ORCID,van de Hoef Tim^ORCID,Landmesser Ulf^ORCID,Guagliumi Giulio,Giannopoulos Andreas A.,Botnar René M.^ORCID,Khamis Ramzi,Williams Michelle C.,Newby David E.,Dewey Marc^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-023-00880-4.pdf

Reference161 articles.

1. Dewey, M. et al. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. Br. Med. J. 355, i5441 (2016).

2. Chang, H.-J. et al. Selective referral using CCTA versus direct referral for individuals referred to invasive coronary angiography for suspected CAD: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 12, 1303–1312 (2019).

3. Rudziński, P. N. et al. Efficacy and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with a high clinical likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease. Kardiol. Pol. 80, 56–63 (2022).

4. The DISCHARGE Trial Group. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1591–1602 (2022).

5. Kheiri, B. et al. Computed tomography vs invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 15, 2147–2149 (2022).

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes;European Heart Journal;2024-08-30

2. Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT;Investigative Radiology;2024-08-21

3. PCSK9 and Coronary Artery Plaque—New Opportunity or Red Herring?;Current Atherosclerosis Reports;2024-08-16

4. Large-scale, comprehensive plasma metabolomic analyses reveal potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of early-stage coronary atherosclerosis;Clinica Chimica Acta;2024-08

5. Addressing air pollution to mitigate cardiovascular risk;Atherosclerosis;2024-08