Abstract
Abstract
Global demand for food is expected to nearly double by 2050. Alternative proteins (AP) have been proposed as a sustainable solution to provide food security as natural resources become more depleted. However, the growth and consumer intake of AP remains limited. This review aims to better understand the challenges and environmental impacts of four main AP categories: plant-based, insect-based, microbe-derived, and cultured meat and seafood. The environmental benefits of plant-based and insect-based proteins have been documented but the impacts of microbe-derived proteins and cultured meat have not been fully assessed. The development of alternative products with nutritional and sensory profiles similar to their conventional counterparts remains highly challenging. Furthermore, incomplete safety assessments and a lack of clear regulatory guidelines confuse the food industry and hamper progress. Much still needs to be done to fully support AP utilization within the context of supporting the drive to make the global food system sustainable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference177 articles.
1. Ehrlich, P. R. & Harte, J. To feed the world in 2050 will require a global revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14743–14744 (2015).
2. Rome. UN report: pandemic year marked by spike in world hunger. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news/item/12-07-2021-un-report-pandemic-year-marked-by-spike-in-world-hunger (2021).
3. Thavamani, A., Sferra, T. J. & Sankararaman, S. Meet the meat alternatives: the value of alternative protein sources. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 9, 346–355 (2020).
4. Xu, X. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat. Food 2, 724–732 (2021).
5. Llor, C. & Bjerrum, L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 5, 229–241 (2014).