Pathways to sustaining tuna-dependent Pacific Island economies during climate change
-
Published:2021-07-29
Issue:10
Volume:4
Page:900-910
-
ISSN:2398-9629
-
Container-title:Nature Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Sustain
Author:
Bell Johann D.ORCID, Senina InnaORCID, Adams TimothyORCID, Aumont Olivier, Calmettes Beatriz, Clark Sangaalofa, Dessert Morgane, Gehlen MarionORCID, Gorgues Thomas, Hampton JohnORCID, Hanich Quentin, Harden-Davies Harriet, Hare Steven R., Holmes Glen, Lehodey Patrick, Lengaigne MatthieuORCID, Mansfield William, Menkes ChristopheORCID, Nicol SimonORCID, Ota Yoshitaka, Pasisi Coral, Pilling Graham, Reid Chis, Ronneberg Espen, Gupta Alex SenORCID, Seto Katherine L., Smith Neville, Taei Sue, Tsamenyi Martin, Williams Peter
Abstract
AbstractClimate-driven redistribution of tuna threatens to disrupt the economies of Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and sustainable management of the world’s largest tuna fishery. Here we show that by 2050, under a high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (RCP 8.5), the total biomass of three tuna species in the waters of ten Pacific SIDS could decline by an average of 13% (range = −5% to −20%) due to a greater proportion of fish occurring in the high seas. The potential implications for Pacific Island economies in 2050 include an average decline in purse-seine catch of 20% (range = −10% to −30%), an average annual loss in regional tuna-fishing access fees of US$90 million (range = −US$40 million to –US$140 million) and reductions in government revenue of up to 13% (range = −8% to −17%) for individual Pacific SIDS. Redistribution of tuna under a lower-emissions scenario (RCP 4.5) is projected to reduce the purse-seine catch from the waters of Pacific SIDS by an average of only 3% (range = −12% to +9%), indicating that even greater reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, in line with the Paris Agreement, would provide a pathway to sustainability for tuna-dependent Pacific Island economies. An additional pathway involves Pacific SIDS negotiating within the regional fisheries management organization to maintain the present-day benefits they receive from tuna, regardless of the effects of climate change on the distribution of the fish.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Food Science,Global and Planetary Change
Reference71 articles.
1. Economic and Development Indicators and Statistics: Tuna Fisheries of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, 2017). 2. Bell, J. D. et al. Diversifying the use of tuna for food security and public health in Pacific Island countries and territories. Mar. Policy 51, 584–591 (2015). 3. Regional Roadmap for Sustainable Pacific Fisheries (Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency and Pacific Community, 2015). 4. Hare, S. R. et al. The Western and Central Pacific Tuna Fishery: 2019 Overview and Status of Stocks Tuna Fisheries Assessment Report No. 20 (Pacific Community, 2020). 5. Lehodey, P., Bertignac, M., Hampton, J., Lewis, A. & Picaut, J. El Niño–Southern Oscillation and tuna in the western Pacific. Nature 389, 715–718 (1997).
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|