Abstract
AbstractIn the United States, normal-risk pregnancies are monitored with the recommended average of 14 prenatal visits. Check-ins every few weeks are the standard of care. This low time resolution and reliance on subjective feedback instead of direct physiological measurement, could be augmented by remote monitoring. To date, continuous physiological measurements have not been characterized across all of pregnancy, so there is little basis of comparison to support the development of the specific monitoring capabilities. Wearables have been shown to enable the detection and prediction of acute illness, often faster than subjective symptom reporting. Wearables have also been used for years to monitor chronic conditions, such as continuous glucose monitors. Here we perform a retrospective analysis on multimodal wearable device data (Oura Ring) generated across pregnancy within 120 individuals. These data reveal clear trajectories of pregnancy from cycling to conception through postpartum recovery. We assessed individuals in whom pregnancy did not progress past the first trimester, and found associated deviations, corroborating that continuous monitoring adds new information that could support decision-making even in the early stages of pregnancy. By contrast, we did not find significant deviations between full-term pregnancies of people younger than 35 and of people with “advanced maternal age”, suggesting that analysis of continuous data within individuals can augment risk assessment beyond standard population comparisons. Our findings demonstrate that low-cost, high-resolution monitoring at all stages of pregnancy in real-world settings is feasible and that many studies into specific demographics, risks, etc., could be carried out using this newer technology.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Guidelines for perinatal care. (American Academy of Pediatrics; The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017).
2. Hunter, S. & Robson, S. C. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Heart 68, 540–543 (1992).
3. Kuo, C. D., Chen, G. Y., Yang, M. J., Lo, H. M. & Tsai, Y. S. Biphasic changes in autonomic nervous activity during pregnancy. Br. J. Anaesth. 84, 323–329 (2000).
4. Green, L. J. et al. Gestation-specific vital sign reference ranges in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 135, 653–664 (2020).
5. Jimah, T. et al. A micro-level analysis of physiological responses to COVID-19: continuous monitoring of pregnant women in California. Front. Public Health 10, 808763 (2022).