Abstract
AbstractPosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) recently becomes one of the most important mental health concerns. However, no previous study has comprehensively reviewed the application of big data and machine learning (ML) techniques in PTSD. We found 873 studies meet the inclusion criteria and a total of 31 of those in a sample of 210,001 were included in quantitative analysis. ML algorithms were able to discriminate PTSD with an overall accuracy of 0.89. Pooled estimates of classification accuracy from multi-dimensional data (0.96) are higher than single data types (0.86 to 0.90). ML techniques can effectively classify PTSD and models using multi-dimensional data perform better than those using single data types. While selecting optimal combinations of data types and ML algorithms to be clinically applied at the individual level still remains a big challenge, these findings provide insights into the classification, identification, diagnosis and treatment of PTSD.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Association, A. P. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 5th edn, 271–280 (American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013).
2. Mota, N. et al. Course and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in the canadian armed forces: a nationally representative, 16-year follow-up study. Can. J. Psychiatry 66, 982–995 (2021).
3. Benjet, C. et al. The epidemiology of traumatic event exposure worldwide: results from the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Psychol. Med. 46, 327–343 (2016).
4. Yehuda, R. et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 1, 108–114 (2015).
5. Shalev, A., Liberzon, I. & Marmar, C. Post-traumatic stress disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2459–2469 (2017).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献