Socio-political and ecological fragility of threatened, free-ranging African lion populations
-
Published:2023-08-29
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:
-
ISSN:2662-4435
-
Container-title:Communications Earth & Environment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Commun Earth Environ
Author:
Nicholson Samantha K.ORCID, Dickman AmyORCID, Hinks Amy, Riggio Jason, Bauer HansORCID, Loveridge Andrew, Becker Matthew, Begg Colleen, Bhalla Shivani, Burnham Dawn, Cotterill Alayne, Dolrenry Stephanie, Dröge EgilORCID, Funston Paul, Hazzah Leela, Ikanda Dennis, Gebresenbet Fikirte, Henschel Philipp, Mandisodza-Chikerema Roseline L., Mbizah Moreangels, Hunter Luke, Jacobsen Kim, Lindsey PeterORCID, Maputla Nakedi, Macdonald Ewan, Macdonald David W., Duff Resson Kantai, Packer CraigORCID, Sillero-Zubiri Claudio, Mudumba TutiloORCID, Strampelli Paolo, Sogbohossou Etotépé A., Tyrrell Peter, Jacobson Andrew P.
Abstract
AbstractLions are one of the world’s most iconic species but are threatened with extinction. Developing effective range-wide conservation plans are crucial but hampered by the relative lack of knowledge on specific threats facing each population and the socio-political context for conservation. Here, we present a range-wide examination of the relative fragility of lion populations, examining socio-political factors alongside ecological ones. We found Ethiopia’s Maze National Park had the most ecologically fragile geographic population while Kavango-Zambezi was the least. At a country level, lion populations had highest ecological fragility in Cameroon and Malawi. When we examined socio-political fragility, Somalia was the most fragile lion range country, followed by South Sudan. When socio-political and ecological fragility were combined, lion populations in Maze National Park and Bush-Bush (Somalia) and more broadly, Somalian and Malawian lion populations were the most fragile. These insights should help inform more nuanced and appropriately targeted lion conservation plans.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Macdonald, E. A. et al. Conservation inequality and the charismatic cat: Felis felicis. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 851–866 (2015). 2. Macdonald, D. W., Jacobsen, K. S., Burnham, D., Johnson, P. J. & Loveridge, A. J. Cecil: A moment or a movement? Analysis of media coverage of the death of a lion, Panthera Leo. Animals 6, 26 (2016). 3. Goldman, M. J., de Pinho, J. R. & Perry, J. Maintaining complex relations with large cats: Maasai and lions in Kenya and Tanzania. Hum. Dimens. Wildlife 15, 332–346 (2010). 4. Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484 (2014). 5. Lindsey, P. A., Balme, G. A., Booth, V. R. & Midlane, N. The significance of African lions for the financial viability of trophy hunting and the maintenance of wild land. PLoS One 7, e29332 (2012).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|