Urban greenspaces and nearby natural areas support similar levels of soil ecosystem services
-
Published:2024-03-16
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:
-
ISSN:2661-8001
-
Container-title:npj Urban Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:npj Urban Sustain
Author:
Eldridge David J.ORCID, Cui Haiying, Ding JingyiORCID, Berdugo Miguel, Sáez-Sandino TadeoORCID, Duran Jorge, Gaitan Juan, Blanco-Pastor José L., Rodríguez AlexandraORCID, Plaza CésarORCID, Alfaro Fernando, Teixido Alberto L.ORCID, Abades SebastianORCID, Bamigboye Adebola R., Peñaloza-Bojacá Gabriel F.ORCID, Grebenc Tine, Nahberger Tine U., Illán Javier G., Liu Yu-RongORCID, Makhalanyane Thulani P.ORCID, Rey AnaORCID, Siebe ChristinaORCID, Sun Wei, Trivedi Pankaj, Verma Jay PrakashORCID, Wang Ling, Wang Jianyong, Wang TianxueORCID, Zaady Eli, Zhou Xiaobing, Zhou Xin-Quan, Delgado-Baquerizo ManuelORCID
Abstract
AbstractGreenspaces are important for sustaining healthy urban environments and their human populations. Yet their capacity to support multiple ecosystem services simultaneously (multiservices) compared with nearby natural ecosystems remains virtually unknown. We conducted a global field survey in 56 urban areas to investigate the influence of urban greenspaces on 23 soil and plant attributes and compared them with nearby natural environments. We show that, in general, urban greenspaces and nearby natural areas support similar levels of soil multiservices, with only six of 23 attributes (available phosphorus, water holding capacity, water respiration, plant cover, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and arachnid richness) significantly greater in greenspaces, and one (available ammonium) greater in natural areas. Further analyses showed that, although natural areas and urban greenspaces delivered a similar number of services at low (>25% threshold) and moderate (>50%) levels of functioning, natural systems supported significantly more functions at high (>75%) levels of functioning. Management practices (mowing) played an important role in explaining urban ecosystem services, but there were no effects of fertilisation or irrigation. Some services declined with increasing site size, for both greenspaces and natural areas. Our work highlights the fact that urban greenspaces are more similar to natural environments than previously reported and underscores the importance of managing urban greenspaces not only for their social and recreational values, but for supporting multiple ecosystem services on which soils and human well-being depends.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Cafaro, P., Hansson, P. & Götmark, F. Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left. Biol. Conserv. 272, 109646 (2022). 2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York: United Nations. 3. Enssle, F. & Kabisch, N. Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people—An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environ. Sci. Policy. 109, 36–44 (2020). 4. Kardan, O., Gozdyra, P. & Misic, B. et al. Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center. Sci. Rep. 5, 11610 (2015). 5. Lee, A. C. K. & Maheswaran, R. The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J. Public. Health. 33, 212–222 (2011).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|