Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) are at risk for micro- and macrovascular complications. Implementable risk scores are needed to improve targeted prevention for patients that are particularly susceptible to complications. The epigenetic clock estimates an individual’s biological age using DNA methylation profiles.
Methods
In this study, we examined older adults of the Berlin Aging Study II that were reexamined on average 7.4 years after baseline assessment as part of the GendAge study. DNA methylation age (DNAmA) and its deviation from chronological age DNAmA acceleration (DNAmAA) were calculated with the 7-CpG clock (available at both timepoints, n = 1,071), Horvath’s clock, Hannum’s clock, PhenoAge and GrimAge (available at follow-up only, n = 1,067). T2D associated complications were assessed with the Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI).
Results
We report on a statistically significant association between oral glucose tolerance test results and Hannum and PhenoAge DNAmAA. PhenoAge was also associated with fasting glucose. In contrast, we found no cross-sectional association after covariate adjustment between DNAmAA and a diagnosis of T2D. However, longitudinal analyses showed that every additional year of 7-CpG DNAmAA at baseline increased the odds for developing one or more additional complications or worsening of an already existing complication during the follow-up period by 11% in male participants with T2D. This association persisted after covariate adjustment (OR = 1.11, p = 0.045, n = 56).
Conclusion
Although our results remain to be independently validated, this study shows promising evidence of utility of the 7-CpG clock in identifying patients with diabetes who are at high risk for developing complications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Federation, I. D. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. (2021).
2. Organization, W.H. Global report on diabetes. 2016. (2017).
3. Ndjaboue, R. et al. Predictive models of diabetes complications: protocol for a scoping review. Syst. Rev. 9, 1–14 (2020).
4. Atlas, I. D. IDF diabetes atlas, 9th edn. Brussels and Belgium; 2019. (2021).
5. Nickerson, H. D. & Dutta, S. Diabetic Complications: Current Challenges and Opportunities. J. Cardiovas.Transl. Res. 5, 375–379 (2012).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献