Abstract
Abstract
Background
Assisted reproductive technology accounts for an increasing proportion of infertility treatments, and assessments to predict clinical pregnancy outcomes are desired. Extracellular vesicles exist in follicular fluid, and small non coding RNAs in extracellular vesicles underline the possibility of reflecting pregnancy potential.
Methods
Follicular fluid samples are collected from 20 ovarian follicles of 15 infertile patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Extracellular vesicles are isolated by serial centrifugation and small RNA sequencing is performed to investigate the profiles of microRNAs and P-element-induced wimpy testis-interacting RNAs.
Results
Small extracellular vesicles with a size range of approximately 100 nm are successfully isolated, and the small non coding RNA profiles of pregnant samples (n = 8) are different from those of non-pregnant samples (n = 12). Fourteen dysregulated small non coding RNAs are selected to identify the independent candidates [mean read count >100, area under the curve >0.8]. Among them, we find that a specific combination of small non coding RNAs (miR-16-2-3p, miR-378a-3p, and miR-483-5p) can predict the pregnant samples more precisely using a receiver operating characteristics curves analysis (area under the curve: 0.96). Furthermore, even in the same patients, the three microRNAs are differentially expressed between pregnant and non-pregnant samples.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that small non coding RNAs derived from small extracellular vesicles in follicular fluid can be potential non-invasive biomarkers for predicting pregnancy, leading to their probable application in assisted reproductive technology. Further large-scale studies are required to validate the clinical usefulness of these small non coding RNAs.
Funder
MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
Uehara Memorial Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Kushnir, V. A., Barad, D. H., Albertini, D. F., Darmon, S. K. & Gleicher, N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 15, 6 (2017).
2. Chambers, G. M. et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014dagger. Hum. Reprod. 36, 2921–2934 (2021).
3. Moolhuijsen, L. M. E. & Visser, J. A. Anti-mullerian hormone and ovarian reserve: update on assessing ovarian function. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 105, 3361–3373 (2020).
4. Nasiri, N. & Eftekhari-Yazdi, P. An overview of the available methods for morphological scoring of pre-implantation embryos in in vitro fertilization. Cell J. 16, 392–405 (2015).
5. Dumesic, D. A., Meldrum, D. R., Katz-Jaffe, M. G., Krisher, R. L. & Schoolcraft, W. B. Oocyte environment: follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil. Steril. 103, 303–316 (2015).