How Thinking Routines Enhance Critical Thinking of Elementary Students

Author:

Manurung Mala RejekiORCID,Masitoh Siti,Arianto FajarORCID

Abstract

Learning English as a foreign language within a primary school in Indonesia tends to be teacher-centered and focuses on the single correct answer. The demands of tests and covering textbook materials for tests prevent students from becoming active thinkers. Specific strategies have been proposed to promote critical thinking skills. Previous studies focused on applying thinking routines either in early childhood or higher education. This study examines the effect of thinking routines on sixth-grade elementary school students' critical thinking ability within an English lesson. The quasi-experimental research was conducted with 64 students divided into a control group (N=32) and an experimental group (N=32)  at two different schools. This research was conducted online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The data is analyzed statistically using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Critical thinking ability tests and observation sheets were used as data collection tools. The results reveal that thinking routines significantly improved sixth-grade students' critical thinking skills. The result suggests using thinking routines in teaching and learning to support students thinking from different points of view.

Funder

#

Publisher

Indonesia Approach Education

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Arends, R. I. (2016). Learning to teach. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill Education.

2. Ben Abu, Y., & Kribushi, R. (2022). Can electronic board increase the motivation of students to study mathematics? Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11807

3. Bowie, A. (2018). Getting students to think critically and visibly. Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, 29(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20429/becoming.2018.290102

4. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Minnesota: ASCD.

5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3