Prediction of resectability of pancreatic malignancy by computed tomography

Author:

McCarthy M J1,Evans J1,Sagar G2,Neoptolemos J P1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Academic Surgery, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

2. Department of Radiology, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in predicting resectability of pancreatic malignancy has been questioned recently and alternative methods have been recommended. Methods To determine the accuracy of CT for predicting resectability and its influence on survival, a standard protocol for performing CT and reporting the results was developed and then compared retrospectively with the ability of one surgeon to perform a resection during 1989–1994. Postoperative survival was determined. Results Of 88 consecutive patients 35 (40 per cent) had CT-resectable disease and 53 (60 per cent) had CT-irresectable disease. Twenty-one patients were excluded because of advanced disease or poor performance status. Of the remaining 67 patients, 47 (70 per cent) had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 20 (30 per cent) had ampullary adenocarcinoma, of whom 32 had a resection, 32 had a palliative bypass and three had only a staging laparoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity for computed tomographic prediction of resectability were 72 and 80 per cent respectively. The positive predictive value was 77 per cent and the negative predictive value 76 per cent. There were seven false-positive and nine false-negative findings. Survival was more dependent on whether or not resection was performed than on computed tomographic predictability of resection. Conclusion CT was reasonably accurate in predicting resectability but cannot be relied on entirely, requiring an improvement in staging methods for pancreatic malignancy.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference51 articles.

1. Cancer statistics 1986;Silverberg;CA Cancer J Clin,1986

2. Cancer statistics 1993;Boring;CA Cancer J Clin,1993

3. Pancreatic cancer in England and Wales: surgeons look at epidemiology;Allen-Mersh;Ann R Coll Surg Engl,1986

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3