Affiliation:
1. Department of General Surgery, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Croesnewydd Road, Wrexham LL13 7TD, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The management of simultaneously occurring abdominal aortic aneurysm and intra-abdominal malignancy is controversial. It is unclear whether to treat the aneurysm first or the malignancy, or both simultaneously. If the malignancy is resected first there is a risk of postoperative rupture of the aneurysm. If simultaneous surgery is performed there is a risk of prosthetic graft infection from contamination by gastrointestinal or urinary tract contents.
Methods
Relevant papers from 1960 to 1996, identified from Medline and manual searching, were reviewed.
Results and conclusion
The literature supports the conclusion that the lesion of greater priority is that posing the greater threat to the patient; this is usually the aneurysm, especially if it is over 6 cm in diameter. For renal malignancies simultaneous surgery is the treatment of choice, but for bladder cancer the best management is unclear. Large aneurysms should usually be resected in preference to colorectal cancer unless the cancer is locally advanced, perforated or likely to result in early intestinal obstruction. If both lesions are complicated there may be a case for simultaneous treatment.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference34 articles.
1. Associated intra-abdominal lesions encountered during resection of aortic aneurysms. Surgical considerations;Ochsner;Dis Colon Rectum,1960
2. Surgery for intra-abdominal lesions associated with resections of aortic aneurysms;Stoll;Wis Med J,1966
3. Management of cholelithiasis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms;Ouriel;Ann Surg,1983
4. Cholelithiasis and aortic reconstruction;String;J Vasc Surg,1984
5. Safety of cholecystectomy with abdominal aortic surgery;Ameli;Can J Surg,1987
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献