Author:
Meng Yuxin,Liu Lu,Xu Zhenlong,Gong Wenwen,Yan Guanpeng
Abstract
Green biased technological progress takes into account the influence of energy input and pollution emission, which is of great significance to China's green development. This paper decomposes technological progress into green input biased technological progress (IBTC) and green output biased technological progress (OBTC) using the Slacks-based measure integrating (SBM) model. Factor bias in technological progress is determined based on data from 34 industries in China from 2000 to 2015. The results show that the green biased technology progress exists significantly in the industry, and most of them promote the growth of green total factor productivity. IBTC first tends to consume energy to pursue capital between capital input and energy input, while it tends to save energy after the Eleventh Five-Year Plan. Between labor input and energy input, it is biased towards saving labor and consume resources. OBTC is biased towards promoting industrial growth and curbing pollution emissions. Medium and light polluting industries are biased towards promoting industrial growth and curbing pollution emissions, while heavy polluting industries are biased towards emitting more pollution.
Reference5 articles.
1. Golden, M. (1988). Did the ancients care when their children died? Greece & Rome, 35(2), 152-163.
2. OECD. (2023). Elderly population (indicator). http://doi.org/10.1787/8d805ea1-en
3. Incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals with psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Samarasekera;Journal of Investigative Dermatology,2013
4. Wang, H. (2021). Aging population may present challenges, and opportunities. China Daily, dated: 11-22.
5. Xinhua. (2022). Youth of China in the New Era. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China, 04.
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献