Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Occipital Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients With Medically Refractory Occipital Neuralgia: Update

Author:

Staudt Michael D.12ORCID,Hayek Salim M.3,Rosenow Joshua M.4,Narouze Samer5,Arle Jeffrey E.6,Pilitsis Julie G.7,Schwalb Jason M.8,Falowski Steven M.9,Sweet Jennifer A.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Neuroscience Center, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA;

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA;

3. Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA;

5. Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA;

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;

7. Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA;

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA;

9. Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA;

10. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Guidelines Task Force conducted a systematic review of the relevant literature on occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) for occipital neuralgia (ON) to update the original 2015 guidelines to ensure timeliness and accuracy for clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature and update the evidence-based guidelines on ONS for ON. METHODS: The Guidelines Task Force conducted another systematic review of the relevant literature, using the same search terms and strategies used to search PubMed and Embase for relevant literature. The updated search included studies published between 1966 and January 2023. The same inclusion/exclusion criteria as the original guideline were also applied. Abstracts were reviewed, and relevant full text articles were retrieved and graded. Of 307 articles, 18 were retrieved for full-text review and analysis. Recommendations were updated according to new evidence yielded by this update. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the original guideline, reporting the use of ONS as an effective treatment option for patients with medically refractory ON. An additional 6 studies were included in this update. All studies in the original guideline and this current update provide Class III evidence. CONCLUSION: Based on the availability of new literature, the current article is a minor update only that does not result in modification of the prior recommendations: Clinicians may use ONS as a treatment option for patients with medically refractory ON.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3