Affiliation:
1. Vanderbilt Sport Concussion Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
3. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA;
4. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Cervical/lumbar total disk replacements (TDRs) are often performed for degenerative conditions but rarely in athletes. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review of athletes undergoing TDRs of both the scientific literature and lay press, with an emphasis on contact sport athletes.
METHODS:
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed/Embase/Cochrane/Scopus/Web of Science databases were queried for all primary literature reporting TDRs in athletes, including both cervical/lumbar disk replacements (CDRs/LDRs). Sports were dichotomized into contact vs limited/noncontact. Because of the public nature of injuries in elite athletes, the lay press was also queried.
RESULTS:
A total of 488 scientific studies were screened, of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Cervical: seven studies reported CDRs in 53 athletes, of which 7 were professional, 22 semiprofessional, and 24 recreational. Of the seven professional athletes, there was one contact sport athlete (kickboxer). All 7/7 professional and 21/22 semiprofessional athletes successfully returned-to-play at 8-52 weeks without complication. Lumbar: Three studies discussed LDRs in 51 athletes, of which 17 were professional, 6 semiprofessional, and 28 recreational. Of the 17 professional athletes, eight played contact sports (2 boxing, 2 alpine skiing, 2 soccer, judo, rugby). All 17 professional and 6 semiprofessional athletes successfully returned to play at 9–21 weeks. Lay Press: five professional contact sport athletes underwent CDRs, and all returned to play: 3 hockey, 1 mixed-martial arts, and 1 Australian-rules football.
CONCLUSION:
The scientific literature and lay press revealed 14 professional contact sport athletes who underwent TDR—6 CDRs and 8 LDRs—all with successful return to play. From the little data that exist, it seems that TDR may be safe in elite athletes; however, the small number of patients highlights the major paucity of data on the safety of TDR in elite contact sport athletes.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Surgery