Neurological Surgery Resident ABNS Written Exam Scores Before and After Introduction of a Weekly Didactic Educational Intervention: A 12-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Study

Abstract

United States neurological surgery residency education has undergone substantive changes over the past 2 decades. Neurosurgical professional bodies have developed numerous initiatives providing standardized assessments and training opportunities for residency programs. However, there have been few studies using standardized measures to assess core components of educational programming in individual programs. We conducted a 12-year retrospective review of resident American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) board scores using our institutional data from 2010 to 2021 to determine the effect of introducing a weekly didactic resident education hour (REH) on resident scores in the ABNS written in-training examination. ABNS scaled scores were analyzed before (2010-2016) and after (2017-2021) REH introduction. To account for a practice effect, we used a 2-factor linear regression model with an interaction term. We obtained ABNS scores from 43 residents representing 132 test attempts. The average ABNS scaled score significantly improved after the introduction of REH (319 vs 410, t = −3.44, P = .0008). Accounting for the practice effect revealed a significant interaction effect between the number of attempts taking the ABNS examination and whether formal didactics were taught, accounting for 46.2 points on the examination (t = 2.309, P = .023); however, REH alone did not have a significant effect on the scaled scores (t = -1.649, P = .102). ABNS written board scores represent a standardized metric by which educational initiatives within training programs may be assessed for efficacy. Further research is needed to identify educational approaches that are effective to meet the goal of demonstrated mastery of fundamental knowledge in neurosurgery across a diversity of neurological surgery residency programs.