Comparison of Accessibility to Cavernous Sinus Areas Throughout Endonasal, Transorbital, and Transcranial Approaches: Anatomic Study With Quantitative Analysis

Author:

Santos Carlos12ORCID,Guizzardi Giulia3,Di Somma Alberto45ORCID,Lopez Patricia12ORCID,Mato David12ORCID,Enseñat Joaquim4,Prats-Galino Alberto56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery and Spine Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain;

2. Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain, Postal address, Edificio IDIVAL;

3. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Naples, Italy;

4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;

5. Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain;

6. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cavernous sinus (CS) is accessed through several approaches, both transcranially and endoscopically. The transorbital endoscopic approach is the newest proposed route in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To quantify and observe the areas of the CS reach from 2 endoscopic and 1 transcranial approaches to the CS in the cadaver laboratory. METHODS: Six CSs were dissected through endoscopic endonasal, transorbital endoscopic, and transcranial pterional approaches, with previous implanted references for neuronavigation during the dissection. Point registration was used to mark the CS exposure and limits through each approach for later area and volume quantification through a computerized technique. RESULTS: The endoscopic endonasal approach reaches most of the CS except part of the sinus's superior, lateral, and posterior regions. The area exposed through this approach was 210 mm2, and the volume was 1165 mm3. The transcranial pterional approach reached the superior and part of the lateral sides of the sinus, not allowing good access to the medial side. The area exposed through this approach was 306 m2, whereas the volume was 815 m3. Finally, the transorbital endoscopic approach accessed the whole lateral side of the sinus but not the medial one. The area exposed was the greatest, 374 m2, but its volume was the smallest, 754 m3. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the endonasal endoscopic approach is the direct route to access the medial, inferior, and part of the superior CS compartments. The transorbital approach is for the lateral side of the CS. Finally, the transcranial pterional approach is the one for the superior side of the CS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3