Affiliation:
1. Columbia University , New York
Abstract
Abstract
Equal treatment for the present and the future was required in two axioms introduced in the articles by Chichilnisky of the years 1996 and 1997. These articles provide a characterization of the decision criterion that satisfies the axioms and shows that the two axioms are equivalent to physical limits in the long-run future. The author proves that maximizing discounted utility with a long-run survival constraint is equivalent to maximizing a criterion that treats equally the present and the future. The equal treatment axioms are therefore the essence of sustainable development. The “weight” λ given to the long-run future is here identified with the marginal utility of the environmental asset along a path that narrowly misses extinction. An existence theorem is also provided for optimizing according to the welfare criterion that treats equally the present and the future. The author shows that no prior welfare criteria satisfy the axioms for sustainable development introduced in her article of the year 1996.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference56 articles.
1. Arrow, K. J. (1953). Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Foundation Monographs. New York: Wiley 1964.
2. Arrow, K.J. (1971). Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures, Yrjo Jahonsson in Saatio, Helsinki.
3. Asheim, G. (1988). “Rawlsian Intergenerational Justice as a Markov-Perfect Equilibrium in a Resource Economy”. Review of Economic Studies 55 (3): 469–484.
4. Asheim, G. (1991). “Unjust Intergenerational Allocations”. Journal of Economic Theory 54 (2): 350–371.
5. Beltratti, A., G., Chichilnisky, and G. M. Heal (1995). “The Green Golden Rule”. Economics Letters 49 (2): 175–179.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献