Affiliation:
1. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Pariser Building, Sackville Street, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Abstract
This paper describes a framework that can be used to evaluate the environmental risks and benefits associated with biofuel production. It uses the example of biodiesel produced from Argentinean soy to show how such a framework can be used to conceptualize trade-offs between different environmental, social and economic impacts of biofuel production. Results showing the greenhouse-gas savings and overall life-cycle impact of different ‘soy-biodiesel’ production methods are presented. These impacts and the significance of uncertainty in overall assessments of key parameters, such as greenhouse-gas savings, are discussed. It is shown that, even where sufficient knowledge exists to be able to quantify these impacts, the sustainability of supply of a particular biofuel is inextricably linked to values and ethical judgements. However, tailoring certification efforts to the issues that are most likely to make a significant difference to the overall sustainability could improve the effectiveness of certification efforts. The potential for a framework to guide and focus certification efforts is discussed and future research and policy priorities suggested.
Subject
Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials,Biochemistry,Bioengineering,Biophysics,Biotechnology
Reference17 articles.
1. From long-term targets to cumulative emission pathways: Reframing UK climate policy
2. United Nations. 2009 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. See http://unfccc.int/2860.php.
3. Committee on Climate Change. 2011 Bioenergy review . London UK: Committee on Climate Change.
4. Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends
5. DfT DECC and Defra. 2012 UK bioenergy strategy . London UK: Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献