Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey

Author:

Conradt Larissa1,List Christian2

Affiliation:

1. JMS Building, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of SussexFalmer, Brighton BN1 9QR, UK

2. Department of Government, London School of EconomicsLondon WC2A 2AE, UK

Abstract

Humans routinely make many decisions collectively, whether they choose a restaurant with friends, elect political leaders or decide actions to tackle international problems, such as climate change, that affect the future of the whole planet. We might be less aware of it, but group decisions are just as important to social animals as they are for us. Animal groups have to collectively decide about communal movements, activities, nesting sites and enterprises, such as cooperative breeding or hunting, that crucially affect their survival and reproduction. While human group decisions have been studied for millennia, the study of animal group decisions is relatively young, but is now expanding rapidly. It emerges that group decisions in animals pose many similar questions to those in humans. The purpose of the present issue is to integrate and combine approaches in the social and natural sciences in an area in which theoretical challenges and research questions are often similar, and to introduce each discipline to the other's key ideas, findings and successful methods. In order to make such an introduction as effective as possible, here, we briefly review conceptual similarities and differences between the sciences, and provide a guide to the present issue.

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference134 articles.

1. Alexander J. M. 2003 Evolutionary game theory. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy . See http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-evolutionary/.

2. Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation

3. Arrow A.K Social choice and individual values. 1951/1963 New York NY:Wiley.

4. Modeling the Effect of Leadership on Crowd Flow Dynamics

5. Austen-Smith D& Banks J.S Positive political theory I: collective preference. 1999 Ann Arbor MI:University of Michigan Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3