Affiliation:
1. AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
2. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine a measurement invariance cut-off point based on item parameter differences in Bayesian Item Response Theory Models. Within this scope, the Bayes factor is estimated for testing measurement invariance. For this purpose, a simulation study is conducted. Data were generated in R software for each simulation condition under the one-parameter logistic model for 10 binary (1-0 scored) items. The invariance test was performed in when group sizes (n=500, 1000, 1500 and 2000) and difficulty parameters vary (dk=0, dk=0.1, dk= 0.3, dk=0.5 and dk=0.7). Bayesian analyzes were performed on WINBUGS using the codes written in R. A Bayes factor that provides evidence for measurement invariance was calculated depending on parameter differences. The Savage–Dickey density ratio, one of the MCMC sampling schemas, was used to calculate the Bayes factor. As a result, if the item parameter difference is dk=0.3 and group sizes are 1500 or larger, the measurement invariance cannot be achieved. However, for small sample sizes (n=1000 or less) measurement invariance interpretation should be done carefully. When the dk=0.5, there are invariant items only in n=500. According to Bayes factor test results, dk=0.7 is a certain cut-off point for measurement invariance.
Publisher
Egitimde ve Psikolojide Olcme ve Degerlendirme Dergisi
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference30 articles.
1. Alamri, A. A. S. (2019). Exploring the Behavior of Model Fit Criteria in the Bayesian Approximate Measurement Invariance: A Simulation Study (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida).
2. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495-508.
3. Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). The multiple groups IRT. In Wim J. van der Linden, & Ronald K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer-Verlag.
4. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Newyork: Guilford Publications.
5. Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55-75.