Author:
Mwansa Mushimbei M.,Serumaga-Zake Philip AE
Abstract
Worldwide, family business has gained prominence as one of the critical vehicles for creating employment and hence made a contribution in the efforts to eradicate poverty. However, most family business lack of leadership succession planning, which eventually lead to low levels of performance and lack of sustainability. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between leadership succession planning, performance, and sustainability of family businesses. A qualitative methodological approach was utilized where participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. Semi-structured interviews were used in collecting data and the collected data was analyzed thematically. The study found that leadership succession planning is linked to sustainability and general performance within family businesses. Conversely, it was found that levels of sustainability and failure of family businesses are related to their inability to come up with effective succession leadership planning. This finding confirms the vital role that leadership succession planning plays in enhancing the performance and sustainability of a family business.
Publisher
Wohllebe & Ross Publishing
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference43 articles.
1. Adler, E.S., Berry, M.J., & Doherty, D. (2013). Pushing “reset”: The condi-tional effects of coaching replacements on college football performance. Social Science Quarterly, 94(1), 1–28.
2. Ankrah, E., & Mensah, C.C.Y. (2015). Measuring Performance in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in the Manufacturing Industry in Ghana. Inter-national Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management Vol-ume 2, Issue 12, December 2015, PP 34-43 ISSN 2394-5923
3. Basco, R. (2015). Family business and regional development: A theoretical model of regional familiness. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 259-271.
4. Boeker, W. (1992). Power and Managerial Dismissal: Scapegoating at the Top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 400-421.
5. Brown, M. (1982). Administrative succession and organizational perfor-mance: The succession effect. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 1–16.