Historicising the emergence of the Aegean culture (1890s)

Author:

Fotiadis Michael

Abstract

In the course of the 20th century Aegean prehistory grew to a vigorous sub-discipline of archaeology and, in the process, the Aegean became firmly established as a distinct prehistoric culture. The notion of an Aegean culture hardened with time to the point that it is difficult today to reflect on its historicity. It is difficult, that is, to think of the Aegean concept as having arisen in a modern context, much easier to think of the Aegean culture as having existed since prehistory, waiting to be discovered by archaeology in the late 19th century. In this essay I try to negotiate the difficulties. More specifically, I review the historical conditions in which, and the processes by which, the Aegean emerged as a distinct prehistoric culture in the 1890s. In brief, I historicise the emergence of the Aegean culture. Historicising disciplinary concepts is a critical exercise. One needs to bring to the fore and scrutinise long-forgotten or overlooked details (e.g., premises of another era that were subsequently repudiated and were with time lost to memory). But make no mistake: historicising disciplinary concepts is heeding the fact that, like all things human, our concepts have histories; it is by no means tantamount to undermining or debunking the concepts under consideration. I will have a little more to say about this and a few other matters at the end of the essay.

Publisher

Archaeopress Publishing Ltd

Subject

General Medicine

Reference101 articles.

1. Alves, A. 2019. The German tradition of self-cultivation (Bildung) and its historical meaning. Educação & Realidade 44 (2): 1–18.

2. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

3. Anonymous. 1890. Archaeological news, general review. American Journal of Archaeology and of the History of the Fine Arts 6: 154–260.

4. Bennett, T. 1988. The exhibitionary complex. New Formations 4: 73–102.

5. Booher, C.R. 2015. Perfection, History, and Harmonious Individuality: Herder’s Ethical Thought, 1765–1791. PhD dissertation, Syracuse University. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/203. Accessed 1.1.2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3