Abstract
Background/Aims: In serological tests for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GENEDIA<sup>®</sup>) and a solid-phase, two-step chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (IMMULITE<sup>®</sup>), which are easy to perform, inexpensive, and widely available, are commonly used. However, local validation of the test performance of IMMULITE<sup>®</sup> is required. This study aimed to examine the performance of IMMULITE<sup>®</sup> in comparison with that of GENEDIA<sup>®</sup> in a Korean health checkup population.Materials and Methods: The sera of 300 subjects among those who underwent health checkup were analyzed using IMMULITE<sup>®</sup>, and results were compared with those of GENEDIA<sup>®</sup>. The two serological tests were compared for their ability to predict atrophic gastritis (AG) or intestinal metaplasia (IM) on endoscopy.Results: We found significant correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.903, <i>P</i><0.0001) and an almost perfect agreement (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient=0.987, <i>P</i><0.0001) between the results of GENEDIA<sup>®</sup> and IMMULITE<sup>®</sup>. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for AG using GENEDIA<sup>®</sup> and IMMULITE<sup>®</sup> were 0.590 and 0.604, respectively, and showed no statistically significant difference in predictive ability for AG (<i>Z</i>-statistics=-0.517, <i>P</i>=0.605). The AUC for IM by GENEDIA<sup>®</sup> and IMMULITE<sup>®</sup> were 0.578 and 0.593, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in predictive ability for IM between the two values (<i>Z</i>-statistics=-0.398, <i>P</i>=0.691).Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in diagnostic value for <i>H. pylori</i> infection was found between GENEDIA<sup>®</sup> and IMMULITE<sup>®</sup>.
Publisher
Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献